The Cost of Being Capable
- Vanessa Leon
- 5 days ago
- 3 min read
There is a particular kind of woman the world quietly relies on.
She is capable.
She adapts.
She figures things out.
She stays composed.
She carries complexity without falling apart.
She might be a daughter, a mother, a partner, a leader, a creative, a professional—or all of these at once.
She is the one who “has it handled.”
And because she can handle things, she often does—without fully realizing that capability, over time, becomes something others feel entitled to.
This is not a story about weakness.It’s a story about the hidden cost of competence.
What “capable” means
Capability is not just productivity or intelligence. It’s an orientation to the world.
It looks like:
emotional regulation under pressure
problem-solving when others freeze
adaptability in unstable systems
responsibility taken early and often
the ability to hold things together quietly
This kind of capability often develops in response to necessity.
Some women learned it in their families.
Some in chaotic environments.
Some through early responsibility.
Some through creative or entrepreneurial survival.
It is rewarded everywhere.
“You’re so strong.”“You’re the responsible one.”“You’ll figure it out.”“I don’t worry about you.”
What’s rarely named is that capability becomes a signal—to families, workplaces, institutions, and systems—that support can flow away from you rather than toward you.
When capability becomes a resource
Over time, something subtle happens.
Your steadiness becomes the default.
Your flexibility becomes the expectation.Your competence becomes the infrastructure others stand on.
You become:
the one who manages emotionally
the one who anticipates needs
the one who absorbs stress
the one who “doesn’t need much”
Your capability stops being a strength you possess and starts being something that is extracted.
Not always consciously.Not always maliciously.
But consistently.
The invisible tax
The cost of being capable is rarely immediate. It accrues quietly.
It shows up as:
being relied on but not supported
being respected but not protected
being trusted with responsibility but not care
being assumed “fine” when you are not
Capable women are often admired—but admiration is not the same as attunement.
Care requires responsiveness.Care requires noticing impact.Care requires adjustment.
Capability often invites relief in others rather than reciprocity.
Across roles, the pattern repeats
As daughters, capable women often become emotional regulators for parents.
As mothers, they are expected to hold everything together.
As workers or leaders, they absorb institutional dysfunction.
As creatives or entrepreneurs, they self-scaffold endlessly.
As partners, they are seen as strong enough to wait, understand, endure.
The role may change.The pattern does not.
Because capability is mistaken for:
limitless capacity
emotional insulation
lack of need
consent to carry more
When strength becomes self-abandonment
Many capable women don’t notice the cost at first because they can manage it.
They make meaning.They contextualize.They empathize.They tolerate.
But there comes a moment of clarity that feels different from burnout.
It sounds like:
I am holding more than is mine to hold.
That realization is often painful—not because being capable is wrong, but because it has quietly replaced mutuality.
Endurance is not the same as choice.Functioning is not the same as flourishing.
Why capable women stay in unsustainable systems
This is not about lack of insight.
Capable women stay because:
they can see complexity
they believe repair is possible
they are used to adapting
they don’t need things to be ideal
But the ability to survive something does not mean it is benign.
Capability can mask harm—both to others and to oneself.
Reclaiming capability without giving yourself away
The answer is not becoming less capable.
The answer is becoming more selective.
It means:
letting capability be intentional, not automatic
distinguishing responsibility from obligation
noticing where your strength is subsidizing dysfunction
allowing systems to feel the weight they’ve outsourced to you
Capability does not obligate you to absorb what others refuse to carry.
A different relationship with strength
Healthy systems—families, workplaces, relationships—do not require one person to hold everything.
In healthy systems:
responsibility circulates
care flows in more than one direction
strength invites support rather than extraction
You are allowed to be capable and cared for.Competent and considered.Reliable and protected.
Your capability is not the problem.
The problem is when it becomes an unspoken contract that says:
Because you can, you should.
You are allowed to renegotiate that contract.
You are allowed to choose where your strength goes.You are allowed to require reciprocity.You are allowed to step out of roles that cost you your inner life.
The cost of being capable does not have to be your humanity.
And strength does not have to mean standing alone.
This theme is one we explore in an ongoing IFS-informed group for women navigating strength, boundaries, and reciprocity.
Comments